However, this paper has focused on two of the four tools (Dedoose and HyperRESEARCH) and evaluated how they compare to NVivo. Some of the notable ones are Dedoose, HyperRESEARCH, Atlas.
#Hyperresearch qualitative software software#
This paper shows that there are many types of software tools for analyzing qualitative data. I choose this tool because I have used it before and based on its comparative performance (with other software tools), it is the most superior software package (compared to HyperRESEARCH and Dedoose). The NVivo software tool will help me to meet this goal. This is the main purpose of the qualitative research design (Janesick, 2004). This way, the research would show conceptual and theoretical correlations among the categories identified. Thereafter, these blocks of data should coalesce into different categories that have the same correlation patterns. These goals align with the main purpose of undertaking qualitative research because it aims to deconstruct blocks of data through fragmentation. This way, I will be equipped with an enhanced data management framework. Similarly, the software would provide a rigorous coding and interpretation process (Tesch, 2013). Learn More Will the Software Packages be Necessary for my Dissertation?īased on the nature of my dissertation, using a software tool would be appropriate because it would shorten the research time. Therefore, departments and institutions often use the software tools at a lower cost than individual researchers do. However, all three packages offer discounts for multiple usages. Dedoose is the only software package that does not charge an extra cost for upgrades. HyperRESEARCH also has the same pricing model and costs up to $2,300 yearly (IST, 2014).
Comparatively, NVivo adopts an annual pricing plan of $2,345 per year (IST, 2014). IST (2014) clarifies that the base price for using the software package is $12.95. Dedoose has the most flexible pricing plan, which depends on monthly payments. Indeed, all the software tools have a “paid” business model. Cost is another important issue that distinguishes the three software tools highlighted in this paper. Lastly, Dedoose has a poor documentation quality (Lewins & Silver, 2007). The NVivo software tool is also superior to the other two tools because it has a high documentation quality, while HyperRESEARCH has a “fair” documentation quality (IST, 2014). However, this similarity does not stretch to customer support availability because NVivo and HyperRESEARCH have an efficient customer support system, while Dedoose has “medium” customer support efficacy. All the software packages have the same business model – paid business model (IST, 2014). While NVivo is a desktop future web tool, HyperRESEARCH is a desktop tool and Dedoose is a web tool (IST, 2014).
NVivo, HyperRESEARCH, and Dedoose have different types of software locations. Comparison of NVivo, HyperRESEARCH, and Dedoose Launched in 2010, the software tool also gave researchers the option of using it on their “iPads” (Scientific Software Development, 2014). Nonetheless, Dedoose changed the dynamics of qualitative research by providing qualitative researchers with the option of using whichever operating system they wanted.
#Hyperresearch qualitative software mac#
However, this process defeated the purpose of having a Mac operating system in the first place. ti or NVivo by using hard drive partitions to conduct Mac-based research (Scientific Software Development, 2014). Often, researchers had to depend on Atlas. However, before the introduction of Dedoose, researchers had few options to choose from, if they wanted to conduct Mac-based research studies (Hahn, 2008).
NVivo and Atlas are good software tools because they are applicable in computers that have a Mac operating system.
Although it has a relatively steep learning curve, compared to HyperRESEARCH, researchers have often used it for analyzing unstructured qualitative data (Silvana & Judith, 2009). NVivo is an internationally recognized software tool for qualitative research that traces its roots to Australian institutions of higher learning (Scientific Software Development, 2014). This advantage is essential for studies that use different researchers because it allows them to use the software with different computers. Most researchers like to use the HyperRESEARCH technique because it accommodates different operating systems (including Microsoft and Mac) (Scientific Software Development, 2014). It is different from the NVivo technique because it allows a researcher to conduct his study in his way (Researchware, Inc., 2014). HyperRESEARCH is a common software tool for analyzing qualitative data.
0 kommentar(er)
